rubbish paper! everyone coming out of the exam was unhappy about it.It was mostly just around economic activites and didn't expand on it at all. and nothing i studied came up because i studied geography....
yeah wasn't a fair paper at all.I was able to answer the questions given...but just about.Shouldnt have given us questions that was not on the curriculum. My teacher spent 6 months on rivers and coasts...din't even come up hahahahah.
Short questions were the easiest I ever did.
Long questions though were quite tricky. I did Q2, 4 & 5.
Q1 was horrible. Only thing that came up as predicted by me on this is the Karst landscape.
Q2 was alright and I predicted B&C correctly. A was different though - it was a variation of the climatic factors that last came up in 2013 which I studied for this exam. Overall, I wasn't disappointed with this question.
Q3 was mostly awful. The only thing that came up here that I predicted was factors that influence the rate of population change. Individual migration? Like what? I never studied individual migration before, only organised migration.
Q4 was a mix. My only problem was the Urban Sprawl one. Everything else was fine.
Q5 was grand, it was as predicted by me.
Overall, not a bad paper.
I think the short questions were very easy and provided no difficulty
In section 2
Q1 was fair enough
Q2 was fair
Q3 some parts were fine but others difficult
Q4 i avoided completly
Q5 the bay was tricky and the built up area for the sketch map but other than that it was ok
I did Q 1,2and 5
Short questions were very easy but the long questions were absolutely ridiculous nothing on seas rivers volcanoes or anything came up or soils or anything like that everything I studied was on the short questions and it was absolutely impossible to do the long questions with the options we were given. I honestly made up so so so much stuff hopefully they'll give me marks for creativity though because I didn't fail because of the short questions I know that much . The questions were so badly mixed and awfully worded it was a really unfair paper
I initially panicked because i mainly studied for physical landscape and not much came up regarding that, but a lot of stuff about urbanisation and population and stuff came back to me so I'm quite chuffed to be honest!
The short questions were so easy !! I thought that the long questions were grand , q1 was bad so I didn't do it , I did 2,3,5 os maps was one of the best questions and in my book individual migration was covered